Extorting the cruelest wolves to use their own gentleness, relinquish hold of their most powerful weapons in their own inborn cruel instincts, to wit that they have what they wanted, thus far, and could do with it as only they chose: not what was asked, demanded or traded away.
Exhaling cruelty, foolishness, and, oddly enough, gentleness, the most powerful weapons of their person in hold, to wit, the thoroughfare asked not, doled what it thought fit, thus far behind in the popular discourse, with only the spirit gum of what they could trade putting them to the right.
Taken to honoring and satiating himself to an amazing degree, with the most flummoxing aspect being the ridiculous deception that i had any hand in it whatsoever, thanks to whatever character flaws of mine, past indecencies, what-not. Were i the despicable sort he pretended me to be, id have ripped his throat long ago, instead of looking at tattered remnants of old wanted posters from a crime long since redressed--that, perhaps, is ironically a difference in opinion.
Taken to degrees of satiation in want of learning the better points of honor, with the most flummoxing aspect that his own character flaws were a ridiculous deception, to the discredit of wherever he lay his hands. Past indecencies, what-not. Pretending me to be a despicable sort, he had imagined wanted posters of the man, myself, poised to rip out his throat, redressing his crime as an ironic footnote, tattered remnant of what he pretended to be.
Taken to pretending, satiating the imagination, the tatters of his own past imaginings float upon the cranial fluid like what-not; what if his character flaws were only a ridiculous deception? What if the man who ripped out his throat were only a daydream, to the discredit of his imagination, and the wanted poster was only pointing-out crimes that had been forgiven in society during a more civilized epoch?
It was said today, of sin: no, no sin, harm to others, taken beyond karma, waiting for God to use a flaming sword? but to have man trade evil for evil, evil for evil, as of the Bible, or its Sharia cousin, where the Bible says in the New Testament with Paul and Christ himself saying not to trade evil-for-evil, forgive seventy times seven times. To wit, it becomes clear they could shed their American values like a ratty overcoat whenever they wanted, yell Old Testament or Koran things, and put that ratty overcoat back on when they lamented the loss of pennies.
Evil-for-evil was/is the Jews and Shiite Muslims?
We're a nation of laws, Sherita, not ill feelings.
Shemika says I have potential.
As Paul also said, beware of the ravenous among your group, for it might come to be that you yourself become devoured.
The flaw in man-directed Karma is such that, though it seem nice and communist, Jew, Muslim, one soon realizes it is not he who decides what among his acts are "bad", but the arbiters of punishment.
And then it gets good, when the pack of wolves break solidarity and begin devouring one another.
No comments:
Post a Comment